YEAR/ANNÉE
1999
Akst, Lesley M.
“Perceived
Value Threat as a Predictor of Discrimination toward
Homosexuals
within the Legal Context.” MA thesis,
University of
Western Ontario, 1999.
(129 p.)
Report of the Ministerial Task Force. Edmonton: The Task Force, 1999.
(1 vol., unpaged)
Ref.: AMICUS catalogue record no. 22467367, which refers in
assigned
descriptors to gays and homosexuality in law in
Allen, Douglas W., and Richards, John, eds.
It
Takes Two: The Family in Law and Finance.
Toronto:
C.D. Howe Institute,
1999. (Policy study no. 33).
(220
p.)
Broader than scope of this
bibliography; essays discuss broad range
of issues regarding law and
the family, taxes and fiscal issues. One of
topics is “arguments for
and against homosexual marriage” – abstract from
Canadian Research Index.
Available on 3 microfiche
from Microlog (no. 99-03241).
Arnup, Katherine.
“Out in This World: The Social and Legal Context of Gay and Lesbian Families.”
Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 10(1) (1999): 1-25.
“Focus is on the changing legal treatment of lesbian & gay families
in the
Bailey, Martha J.
Marriage and Marriage-Like Relationships. Submitted to Susan Zimmerman by
Martha
Bailey. Ottawa,
Ont.: Law Commission of
http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/301/lcc-cdc/marriage_marriage-like-e/index.html
Electronic file with URL above verified by accessing document February
14, 2002.
Issued also in French under title: Le mariage et les unions libres (in above
URL substitute “marriage-like-f” for “marriage-like-e” for French)
Refs.: AMICUS catalogue record nos. 25918107 (English) and
25918151 (French)
Banks, K. S.
“Could
Mom Be Wrong?: The Hurt of Names and Words: Hate Propaganda and
Freedom
of Expression in
(172KB).
Availability,
as given Jan. 18, 2001 by NISC Gay & Lesbian Abstracts,
is
as follows: Murdoch
University Law
School, Perth, Western
Electronic archive: http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/pandora/elaw.html
(archived
1 Sept. 1999).
“The author
examines the nature of hate speech against gay men and
lesbians in light
of the protections offered by the hate propaganda
sections of
Beaman, Lori G.
“Sexual
Orientation and Legal Discourse: Legal Construction of the
‘Normal’
Family.” Canadian Journal of Law and
Society 14 (Fall 1999):
173-201.
Bédard, Antoine.
“La
Cour d’appel du Québec se prononce sur la constitutionnalité de la
législation
sur les relations anales.” Canadian HIV AIDS Policy & Law
Newsletter
4(2/3) (Spring 1999): 15-16.
Published
also in English in same newsletter, pp. 13-14, under
title:
“Quebec Court of Appeal Rules on the Constitutionality of
Law
on Anal Sex.”
Bergman, Brian.
“Not
with Standing:
Maclean’s
[Toronto ed.],
March 29, 1999, p. 22 (816 words).
Blackwell, Susan.
“New
Laws for Same Sex Partners.” Money
and Family Law 14 (Nov. 1999):
84-85.
British Columbia Law Institute.
Report
on Recognition of Spousal and Family Status. Vancouver:
British
Columbia
Law Institute, 1999.
(133
p.; ISBN 1894278038)
Broader
than scope of bibliography; includes discussion of
unmarried
couples, including gay couples.
Several AMICUS catalogue records describe a 1998 imprint of same title,
paged,
variously, at 133 or 331 pp.
Buist, Margaret.
“Case
Comment: M v. H.” (Sept. 1999) 46 R.F.L. (4th)
331-338.
R.F.L.
(4th) is Reports of Family Law (Fourth Series).
Cossman, Brenda, and Ryder, Bruce.
“M
v. H: Time to Clean Up Your Acts.” Constitutional
Forum 10 (Spring 1999):
59-64.
Relevant
statute:
Davis, Craig D.
“Vriend
v.
on
the Winding Path to Substantive Equality.”
(August
1999): 683-714.
Gavigan, Shelley A. M.
“Legal
Forms, Family Forms, Gendered Norms: What Is a Spouse?”
Canadian
Journal of Law and Society 14(1) (Spring 1999): 127-157.
Indexing
descriptors: lesbians; spouses; fatherless family; family law –
Graff, E. J.
“Same-Sex
Spouses in
Are
Cheering a Critical Legal Victory.” The
Nation 269 (July 12, 1999):
23-24.
Concerns
Supreme Court of Canada ruling in M v. H case.
Nation
is an American journal, offering a view of the Canadian
ruling
in international context.
Gray, Christopher B.
“Marriage,
the Law, and Samesex Unions.” Revue générale de droit [University
of Ottawa?] 30(1999/2000): 583-605.
Hickman, Larry A.
“Making
the Family Functional: The Case for Legalizing Same-Sex Domestic
Partnerships.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences
29(2) (June 1999): 231-247.
Hurley, Mary C.
Federal Legislation Containing Terms Relating to Spousal or Marital Status.
Ottawa, Ont.: Parliamentary Research Branch, 1999.
Issued in print and electronic formats.
Issued
in English and French. French title: Lois fédérales
renfermant
des termes se rapportant à la qualité de conjoint.
Refs.: AMICUS catalogue record nos. 24111325 and 22996385, for
example. Attempt February 14, 2002 to access URL given
in record 24111325 unsuccessful and address is, therefore,
not given here.
Jenish, D’Arcy.
“The
Family Redefined: The Supreme Court Expands Spousal Support
Provisions
to Include Separated Gay Couples.” Maclean’s,
May 31, 1999,
pp.
26-28 (1175 words).
Supreme
Court of Canada ruling in M v. H case.
Labrèche, Louise.
“Rentes
aux conjoints survivants de même sexe: où en sommes-nous?”
Assurances
66(4) (janv. 1999): 687-691.
“Chronologie
en 1998 des changements ou des propositions de
changements
législatifs, et des décisions judiciaires concernant
les
prestations aux survivants de couples homosexuels [etc.]” –
Repère
résumé.
Labrèche, Louise.
“Résumé
des différentes législations québécoises concernant les conjoints
de
même sexe.” Assurances 67(3)
(oct. 1999): 507-509.
Lahey, Kathleen Ann.
Are
We ‘Persons’ Yet? : Law and Sexuality in
of Toronto Press, c1999.
(474 p.; ISBN 0802042058;
0802080626)
Lajoie, Andrée; Gelineau, Eric; and Janda,
Richard.
“When
Silence Is No Longer Acquiescence: Gays and Lesbians under
Canadian
Law.” Canadian Journal of Law and
Society 14(1) (Spring 1999):
101-126.
Legaré, Francine.
“Conjointes
de même sexe: sortir les droits du placard.”
La Gazette des femmes
[Québec]
20(5) (janv.-févr. 1999): 38-41.
“Ouvertures
et limites au sujet d’une reconnaissance légale et sociale
plus
juste des couples homosexuels, au Québec et ailleurs” – Repère
résumé.
Lucas,
Timothy Joseph.
“Sexual Orientation and the Law:
An Examination of the Discourse on Two
Federal
Acts in
(151
p.)
“M v.
H.” (Sept 1999) 46 R.F.L. (4th)
32-330, with annotation by James G.
McLeod in English (pp. 52-55)
and in French (pp. 55-59).
Text in English and
French. Supreme Court of Canada heard
case March 18,
1999, judgment May 20, 1999. R.F.L. (4th) is
Reports of
Family Law (Fourth Series).
[M v. H]: Gay
Couples Win Rights: They’re Entitled to the Same Spousal
Support as Common-Law Couples,
Charles Gonthier in Dissent
[excerpt]; From the Majority M. v. H.
Decision [excerpt]; The Next
Step. Key Dates; 63-Year-Old Celebrates
Court’s Decision; Legal
Marriages for Gays May Be Next.”
Globe and Mail [Metro
ed.], May 21, 1999, p. A8 (check also p. A1)
Compiler-supplied
title proper; group of articles, all focussing on the
M. v. H. Supreme
Court of Canada decision and all from same source.
MacDougall, Bruce.
“Case
Comment on M versus H.”
Macklem,
Timothy.
“Making the Private
Public.” McGill Law Journal 44
(April 1999): 197-230.
Concerns
Vriend v.
Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms.
Makin, Kirk.
“Gay Couples Win Rights:
They’re Entitled to the Same Spousal Support as
Common Law Couples,
(July 1999): 52-53.
McCarthy,
Martha, and Radbord, Joanna.
“Reflections on the Impact of M
v. H.” Money and Family Law 14
(July 1999): 49-51.
Mickman, Robert.
“Discrimination against Same-Sex Couples in Tax Law.” International
Journal of Law, Policy and the Family [United Kingdom] 13(1)
(April 1999): 33-51.
Author: Director of Legal Research, Citizens for Fiscal
Responsibility, Vancouver, B.C.
Olchowy,
James R.
“Inside McClung J. A.’s ‘Closet’ in Vriend v.
Misrecognition, the Tool of
Oppressive Privacy, and an Ideology of
Equality.”
Owen,
Michelle Kelly.
“‘We
Are Family?’: The Struggle for Same-Sex Spousal Recognition in
University of Toronto,
1999.
(326 p.)
Québec
(Province). Conseil du statut de la
femme.
Commentaires sur le projet
de loi concernant les conjoints de fait de même
sexe. Recherche et rédaction, Guylaine Bérubé. Québec: le Conseil,
1999.
(36 p.; ISBN 255034703X)
Ross, June.
“Landmark Victory for Gays and
Lesbians Needs Legislative Action for
True Equality.” Law Now 24(1) (Aug./Sept. 1999):
9 (762 words).
Concerns M v. H
ruling by Supreme Court of Canada.
“School Rule
Condemning Homosexual Practice Vindicated.”
Education Law Reporter
10(7) (March 1999): 55-57.
About Trinity Western
University v. British Columbia College
of
Teachers.
Scotton,
Geoffrey.
“Lesbians’ Adoptions Approved
in
(Dec. 1999): 1-2.
“The
Separation of State Powers in Liberal Polity: Vriend v.
McGill Law Journal 44
(April 1999): 231-253.
Taylor, Susan R.
“Gay
and Lesbian Pornography and the Obscenity Laws in
Dalhousie
Journal of Legal Studies 8(1999): 94-129.